MathBored

Virginia SOL Mathematics Textbook

Workbook pagesAnswer key

Chapter 2 — Comparing and Ordering Rational Numbers

Standard: 7.NS.2 — The student will reason and use multiple strategies to compare and order rational numbers.

By the end of this chapter you will be able to:

Lessons: 2.1 What Makes a Number Rational · 2.2 Comparing with Benchmarks and Equivalency · 2.3 Comparing on a Number Line with <<, >>, and == · 2.4 Ordering a Set of Rational Numbers

Calculator note. This chapter is assessed without a calculator. Every problem here is built so that benchmarks, common denominators, and short pencil division are enough. If you find yourself reaching for a calculator, that is a signal to look for the easier strategy you missed.


Lesson 2.1 — What Makes a Number Rational

One family, many outfits

In Grade 6 you compared integers. This year the number line gets crowded: fractions, mixed numbers, decimals, and percents all move in. The good news is that they are not four unrelated kinds of number. They are four ways of writing the same kind of number.

A rational number is any number that can be written as a fraction ab\dfrac{a}{b}, where aa and bb are integers and b0b \ne 0. The word rational comes from ratio, not from "reasonable" — a rational number is a number expressible as a ratio of two integers.

That single definition is wider than it first looks:

A number that cannot be written as a ratio of integers is not rational. A decimal like 0.1211211120.121121112\ldots, whose digits go on forever without ever settling into a repeating block, is such a number. You will meet those in Grade 8. Everything in this chapter is rational.

Reading the forms

Three names for one point on the number line

Look carefully at that picture. There is exactly one point marked. The labels 34\tfrac{3}{4}, 0.750.75, and 75%75\% are three names for it, the way a person can be Katherine, Kate, and Ms. Alvarez without being three people. Equivalent forms are different-looking expressions with the same value.

This is the central idea of the chapter. You almost never compare a fraction to a decimal directly. You rewrite one of them so both wear the same outfit, and then the comparison is easy.

Moving between forms

Fraction to decimal. Divide the numerator by the denominator. 38=3÷8=0.375\dfrac{3}{8} = 3 \div 8 = 0.375.

3÷8:30÷8=3 remainder 60.3  60÷8=7 remainder 40.37  40÷8=5 remainder 00.375\begin{aligned} 3 \div 8 &: \quad 30 \div 8 = 3 \text{ remainder } 6 &&\rightarrow 0.3 \\ &\quad\ \ 60 \div 8 = 7 \text{ remainder } 4 &&\rightarrow 0.37 \\ &\quad\ \ 40 \div 8 = 5 \text{ remainder } 0 &&\rightarrow 0.375 \end{aligned}

Some divisions never end. 56=0.8333\dfrac{5}{6} = 0.8333\ldots, written 0.830.8\overline{3}, where the bar marks the digit that repeats forever. A repeating decimal is still rational — it still came from a ratio of integers.

Decimal to fraction. Say the decimal out loud and write what you hear. 0.40.4 is "four tenths," so 0.4=410=250.4 = \dfrac{4}{10} = \dfrac{2}{5}. 0.1250.125 is "one hundred twenty-five thousandths," so 0.125=1251000=180.125 = \dfrac{125}{1000} = \dfrac{1}{8}. Then simplify.

Anything to percent. A percent means "per hundred," so 37%37\% means 37100\dfrac{37}{100}. To go from a decimal to a percent, multiply by 100100 — which shifts the digits two places left. 0.37537.5%0.375 \rightarrow 37.5\%. To go from a percent to a decimal, divide by 100100: 45%0.4545\% \rightarrow 0.45.

Mixed number to improper fraction. Multiply the whole part by the denominator, add the numerator, keep the denominator. 215=2×5+15=1152\tfrac{1}{5} = \dfrac{2 \times 5 + 1}{5} = \dfrac{11}{5}.

For a negative mixed number, the sign belongs to the whole quantity, not just the whole part: 138-1\tfrac{3}{8} means the opposite of 1381\tfrac{3}{8}, so it equals 118=1.375-\dfrac{11}{8} = -1.375. Students often lose the sign on the fraction part here, and it is worth slowing down for.

Fractions, decimals, and percents on one number line

The conversions worth memorizing

You will do this so often that a handful of conversions should become automatic. Knowing these lets you compare in your head instead of on paper.

Fraction Decimal Percent
12\tfrac{1}{2} 0.50.5 50%50\%
14\tfrac{1}{4} 0.250.25 25%25\%
34\tfrac{3}{4} 0.750.75 75%75\%
15\tfrac{1}{5} 0.20.2 20%20\%
18\tfrac{1}{8} 0.1250.125 12.5%12.5\%
110\tfrac{1}{10} 0.10.1 10%10\%
13\tfrac{1}{3} 0.30.\overline{3} 3313%33\tfrac{1}{3}\%

Worked examples

Example 1 — Writing an integer as a fraction

Show that 6-6 is a rational number.

A rational number is a ratio of two integers with a nonzero denominator. Put 6-6 over 11.

6=61-6 = \frac{-6}{1}

Both 6-6 and 11 are integers, and 101 \ne 0.

Answer: 6=61-6 = \dfrac{-6}{1}, so it is rational.

Example 2 — Fraction to decimal to percent

Write 720\dfrac{7}{20} as a decimal and as a percent.

Twenty divides into one hundred evenly, so build an equivalent fraction with denominator 100100 instead of dividing.

720=7×520×5=35100=0.35\frac{7}{20} = \frac{7 \times 5}{20 \times 5} = \frac{35}{100} = 0.35

And 35100\dfrac{35}{100} is 3535 per hundred.

Answer: 0.350.35 and 35%35\%

Example 3 — Decimal to fraction in simplest form

Write 0.375-0.375 as a fraction in simplest form.

Read it: three hundred seventy-five thousandths, negative.

0.375=3751000-0.375 = -\frac{375}{1000}

Divide numerator and denominator by 125125:

375÷1251000÷125=38-\frac{375 \div 125}{1000 \div 125} = -\frac{3}{8}

Answer: 38-\dfrac{3}{8}

Example 4 — Negative mixed number, three ways

Write 215-2\tfrac{1}{5} as an improper fraction and as a decimal.

First convert the size, then attach the sign to the whole thing.

215=2×5+15=115,115=11÷5=2.22\tfrac{1}{5} = \frac{2 \times 5 + 1}{5} = \frac{11}{5}, \qquad \frac{11}{5} = 11 \div 5 = 2.2

Answer: 115-\dfrac{11}{5} and 2.2-2.2

Example 5 — Percent greater than 100

Write 150%150\% as a decimal and as a fraction in simplest form.

Percent means per hundred, so 150%=150100150\% = \dfrac{150}{100}. Dividing by 100100 gives the decimal.

150%=150100=1.5=32=112150\% = \frac{150}{100} = 1.5 = \frac{3}{2} = 1\tfrac{1}{2}

A percent above 100%100\% is simply a number greater than 11. There is nothing illegal about it.

Answer: 1.51.5 and 32\dfrac{3}{2}

Guided practice

  1. Write each number as a fraction of two integers. a) 77 b) 2.5-2.5 c) 0.60.6 d) 134-1\tfrac{3}{4}
  2. Write 38\dfrac{3}{8} as a decimal and as a percent.
  3. Write 45%45\% as a fraction in simplest form and as a decimal.
  4. Write 215-2\tfrac{1}{5} as an improper fraction and as a decimal.
  5. Is 0.1250.125 a rational number? Explain how you know.

Independent practice

  1. Write each fraction as a decimal: a) 78\dfrac{7}{8} b) 320\dfrac{3}{20} c) 925\dfrac{9}{25} d) 114\dfrac{11}{4}
  2. Write each decimal as a fraction in simplest form: a) 0.40.4 b) 0.375-0.375 c) 0.1250.125 d) 1.61.6
  3. Write each as a percent: a) 14\dfrac{1}{4} b) 0.070.07 c) 910\dfrac{9}{10} d) 1.251.25
  4. Write each percent as a decimal and as a fraction in simplest form: a) 60%60\% b) 8%8\% c) 150%150\%
  5. Which of these are rational numbers: 6-6, 0.750.75, 213-2\tfrac{1}{3}, 0.1211211120.121121112\ldots (the digits never end and never repeat), 125\dfrac{12}{5}?
  6. Application. A set of plans calls for a board 58\tfrac{5}{8} inch thick. The lumber at the store is labeled 0.6250.625 inch thick. Is that the same thickness or a different one? Show the conversion that settles it.
  7. Reasoning. Explain why every integer is a rational number, using 9-9 as your example. Then explain why the reverse is not true.

Exit ticket 2.1

  1. Write 0.350.35 as a fraction in simplest form and as a percent.
  2. Write 138-1\tfrac{3}{8} as an improper fraction and as a decimal.
  3. Write 45\dfrac{4}{5} as a decimal and as a percent.
  4. Explain in a sentence why 7-7 is a rational number.

Lesson 2.2 — Comparing with Benchmarks and Equivalency

Two strategies, one goal

To compare two rational numbers you need them in a form where the comparison is obvious. There are two reliable ways to get there.

Strategy 1: benchmarks. A benchmark is a familiar reference value — usually 00, 12\tfrac{1}{2}, or 11 — that you compare both numbers to. If one number is below the benchmark and the other is above it, you are done without any exact arithmetic.

Strategy 2: equivalency. Rewrite both numbers in the same form: a common denominator, or both as decimals, or both as percents. Then compare digit by digit or numerator by numerator.

Benchmarks are faster; equivalency always works. Skilled students try the benchmark first and fall back to equivalency when the two numbers land on the same side.

Using one half as a benchmark

Zero, one half, and one as benchmarks

Here is the test, and it is worth saying out loud until it is automatic:

A fraction is greater than 12\tfrac{1}{2} when its numerator is more than half its denominator, less than 12\tfrac{1}{2} when its numerator is less than half its denominator, and equal when the numerator is exactly half.

Try 59\dfrac{5}{9}. Half of 99 is 4.54.5. The numerator 55 is more than 4.54.5, so 59>12\dfrac{5}{9} > \dfrac{1}{2}.

Try 512\dfrac{5}{12}. Half of 1212 is 66, and 5<65 < 6, so 512<12\dfrac{5}{12} < \dfrac{1}{2}.

Now put those together with a second fraction. Comparing 512\dfrac{5}{12} and 713\dfrac{7}{13} by common denominator would mean working in 156156ths — unpleasant with no calculator. But 512\dfrac{5}{12} is below one half and 713\dfrac{7}{13} is above it (half of 1313 is 6.56.5, and 7>6.57 > 6.5), so 512<713\dfrac{5}{12} < \dfrac{7}{13} with no multiplication at all.

Using equivalency

When both numbers sit on the same side of every benchmark, rewrite them.

Common denominator. Compare 23\dfrac{2}{3} and 58\dfrac{5}{8}. The least common denominator of 33 and 88 is 2424.

23=1624,58=1524\frac{2}{3} = \frac{16}{24}, \qquad \frac{5}{8} = \frac{15}{24}

Same-size pieces now, so more pieces means more. 16>1516 > 15, therefore 23>58\dfrac{2}{3} > \dfrac{5}{8}.

Common form. Compare 38\dfrac{3}{8} and 0.40.4. Convert the fraction: 38=0.375\dfrac{3}{8} = 0.375. Line up the place values and compare left to right.

0.375versus0.4000.375 \quad \text{versus} \quad 0.400

The tenths place decides it: 3<43 < 4, so 38<0.4\dfrac{3}{8} < 0.4. Writing 0.40.4 as 0.4000.400 is the small move that keeps this honest — comparing 0.3750.375 to 0.40.4 can tempt you into thinking the longer decimal is the larger number, which is exactly backwards.

A close-up comparison of three fifths and five eighths

Comparing negatives

The rules do not change, but the direction does. On the negative side of zero, the number closer to zero is greater. So among negatives, the one with the smaller distance from zero wins.

Compare 58-\dfrac{5}{8} and 0.6-0.6. Convert: 58=0.625-\dfrac{5}{8} = -0.625. Which is closer to zero? 0.60.6 is closer than 0.6250.625, so

0.6>0.625,that is,0.6>58-0.6 > -0.625, \qquad \text{that is,} \qquad -0.6 > -\frac{5}{8}

A useful habit: compare the two numbers as if they were positive, then flip the result. Since 0.6<0.6250.6 < 0.625, we get 0.6>0.625-0.6 > -0.625.

Worked examples

Example 1 — Benchmark comparison

Which is greater, 49\dfrac{4}{9} or 712\dfrac{7}{12}?

Half of 99 is 4.54.5, and 4<4.54 < 4.5, so 49<12\dfrac{4}{9} < \dfrac{1}{2}. Half of 1212 is 66, and 7>67 > 6, so 712>12\dfrac{7}{12} > \dfrac{1}{2}.

One is below the benchmark and one is above it.

Answer: 712\dfrac{7}{12} is greater.

Example 2 — Common denominator

Compare 34\dfrac{3}{4} and 710\dfrac{7}{10} using <<, >>, or ==.

Both are above 12\tfrac{1}{2}, so the benchmark does not settle it. The least common denominator of 44 and 1010 is 2020.

34=1520,710=1420\frac{3}{4} = \frac{15}{20}, \qquad \frac{7}{10} = \frac{14}{20}

Answer: 34>710\dfrac{3}{4} > \dfrac{7}{10}

Example 3 — Fraction against a percent

Compare 65%65\% and 58\dfrac{5}{8}.

Put both in percent form. 58=0.625=62.5%\dfrac{5}{8} = 0.625 = 62.5\%.

65%versus62.5%65\% \quad \text{versus} \quad 62.5\%

Answer: 65%>5865\% > \dfrac{5}{8}

Example 4 — Two negatives

Compare 23-\dfrac{2}{3} and 35-\dfrac{3}{5}.

Ignore the signs for a moment and use the common denominator 1515:

23=1015,35=915\frac{2}{3} = \frac{10}{15}, \qquad \frac{3}{5} = \frac{9}{15}

So 23>35\dfrac{2}{3} > \dfrac{3}{5}, which means 23\dfrac{2}{3} is farther from zero. On the negative side, farther from zero is less.

Answer: 23<35-\dfrac{2}{3} < -\dfrac{3}{5}

Example 5 — Deciding they are equal

Compare 120%120\% and 65\dfrac{6}{5}.

120%=120100=65120\% = \frac{120}{100} = \frac{6}{5}

They are the same number in different forms, so the correct symbol is ==. Not every comparison ends in << or >>, and noticing equality is part of the skill.

Answer: 120%=65120\% = \dfrac{6}{5}

Guided practice

  1. Is 59\dfrac{5}{9} less than, greater than, or equal to 12\dfrac{1}{2}? Show the halving test.
  2. Is 38\dfrac{3}{8} closest to 00, 12\dfrac{1}{2}, or 11?
  3. Compare 23\dfrac{2}{3} and 58\dfrac{5}{8} using a common denominator.
  4. Compare 0.60.6 and 35\dfrac{3}{5}.
  5. Compare 45%45\% and 25\dfrac{2}{5}.

Independent practice

  1. Use the one-half benchmark. For each fraction, state whether it is greater than or less than 12\dfrac{1}{2}: a) 49\dfrac{4}{9} b) 712\dfrac{7}{12} c) 511\dfrac{5}{11} d) 916\dfrac{9}{16}
  2. Compare using a common denominator. Fill in <<, >>, or ==: a) 34    710\dfrac{3}{4} \ \underline{\ \ } \ \dfrac{7}{10} b) 56    89\dfrac{5}{6} \ \underline{\ \ } \ \dfrac{8}{9} c) 23    35-\dfrac{2}{3} \ \underline{\ \ } \ -\dfrac{3}{5}
  3. Compare by converting to decimals. Fill in <<, >>, or ==: a) 38    0.4\dfrac{3}{8} \ \underline{\ \ } \ 0.4 b) 720    0.35\dfrac{7}{20} \ \underline{\ \ } \ 0.35 c) 14    0.2-\dfrac{1}{4} \ \underline{\ \ } \ -0.2
  4. Fill in <<, >>, or ==: a) 65%    5865\% \ \underline{\ \ } \ \dfrac{5}{8} b) 30%    3830\% \ \underline{\ \ } \ \dfrac{3}{8} c) 120%    65120\% \ \underline{\ \ } \ \dfrac{6}{5}
  5. Which is greater, 58-\dfrac{5}{8} or 0.6-0.6? Show the work that proves it.
  6. Application. In Ms. Reyes' class, 38\dfrac{3}{8} of the students walk to school. In Mr. Kim's class, 40%40\% of the students walk. Which class has the greater share of walkers? Justify your answer in writing.
  7. Reasoning. Explain how the benchmark 12\dfrac{1}{2} lets you compare 512\dfrac{5}{12} and 713\dfrac{7}{13} without ever finding a common denominator.

Exit ticket 2.2

  1. Is 715\dfrac{7}{15} greater than or less than 12\dfrac{1}{2}?
  2. Fill in <<, >>, or ==: 56    0.8\dfrac{5}{6} \ \underline{\ \ } \ 0.8
  3. Fill in <<, >>, or ==: 34    0.7-\dfrac{3}{4} \ \underline{\ \ } \ -0.7
  4. Explain in writing how you know that 920<12\dfrac{9}{20} < \dfrac{1}{2} without dividing.

Lesson 2.3 — Comparing on a Number Line with <<, >>, and ==

The rule that never fails

Every comparison in this chapter reduces to one fact about the number line, the same fact you used with integers in Grade 6:

The number farther to the right is greater. The number farther to the left is less.

What is new in Grade 7 is that the points between the integers are now in play.

Positive and negative rational numbers on a number line

Read that line left to right: 74-\tfrac{7}{4}, then 0.5-0.5, then 34\tfrac{3}{4}, then 1141\tfrac{1}{4}. Every one of these is true, and you can see each one:

74<0.5,0.5<34,34<114-\frac{7}{4} < -0.5, \qquad -0.5 < \frac{3}{4}, \qquad \frac{3}{4} < 1\frac{1}{4}

Notice that 74-\tfrac{7}{4} is 1.75-1.75, which lands three quarter-marks past 1-1 on the way to 2-2. Placing a value correctly is itself a check on your conversion: if you cannot say where it goes, you do not yet know how big it is.

Placing a number before comparing it

To locate a rational number on a number line:

  1. Decide the sign. Negative means left of zero.
  2. Find the two integers it falls between. For 74=1.75-\tfrac{7}{4} = -1.75, that is 2-2 and 1-1.
  3. Divide that unit into equal parts matching the denominator or decimal place, and count.
  4. Label the point with the original form, so your picture answers the question that was asked.

The three symbols

Symbol Meaning Example Read as
<< is less than 34<0.7-\tfrac{3}{4} < -0.7 negative three fourths is less than negative seven tenths
>> is greater than 58>0.6\tfrac{5}{8} > 0.6 five eighths is greater than six tenths
== is equal to 0.75=75%0.75 = 75\% seventy-five hundredths equals seventy-five percent

The open end of the symbol always faces the greater number. Because of that, every comparison can be written two ways: 1.75<1.7-1.75 < -1.7 and 1.7>1.75-1.7 > -1.75 say the same thing. Which one you write depends only on which number you started with.

The trap: longer is not larger

With whole numbers, more digits means a bigger number. With decimals, that habit becomes a bug.

1.2versus1.02-1.2 \quad \text{versus} \quad -1.02

The second one has more digits, but 1.021.02 is closer to 11 than 1.21.2 is. Line up the place values:

1.20versus1.02-1.20 \quad \text{versus} \quad -1.02

In the tenths place, 2>02 > 0, so 1.2>1.021.2 > 1.02, so 1.21.2 is farther from zero. On the negative side that makes it less: 1.2<1.02-1.2 < -1.02.

Padding with zeros so both decimals have the same number of places costs you two seconds and prevents this mistake entirely. And padding never changes a value: 0.50.5, 0.500.50, and 0.5000.500 all name the identical point, because five tenths, fifty hundredths, and five hundred thousandths are the same amount.

Worked examples

Example 1 — A fraction against a decimal

Fill in <<, >>, or ==:  38    0.4\ \dfrac{3}{8} \ \underline{\ \ } \ 0.4, then locate both on a number line.

38=0.375\dfrac{3}{8} = 0.375. Padding, compare 0.3750.375 and 0.4000.400. In the tenths place 3<43 < 4.

On a line marked in thousandths between 0.30.3 and 0.50.5, the point 0.3750.375 sits to the left of 0.4000.400.

Answer: 38<0.4\dfrac{3}{8} < 0.4

Example 2 — Two negative decimals

Compare 2.5-2.5 and 2.05-2.05.

Pad: 2.50-2.50 and 2.05-2.05. Ignoring signs, 2.50>2.052.50 > 2.05, so 2.5-2.5 is farther from zero and therefore farther left.

Answer: 2.5<2.05-2.5 < -2.05

Example 3 — A negative fraction against a negative decimal

Compare 38-\dfrac{3}{8} and 0.4-0.4.

38=0.375-\dfrac{3}{8} = -0.375. Pad: 0.375-0.375 and 0.400-0.400. Since 0.375<0.4000.375 < 0.400, the value 0.375-0.375 is closer to zero, so it lies to the right.

Answer: 38>0.4-\dfrac{3}{8} > -0.4

Example 4 — Recognizing equality across forms

Compare 0.8-0.8 and 45-\dfrac{4}{5}.

45=0.8\dfrac{4}{5} = 0.8, so 45=0.8-\dfrac{4}{5} = -0.8. They are the same point.

Answer: 0.8=45-0.8 = -\dfrac{4}{5}

Example 5 — Writing a comparison both ways

Write two true statements comparing 25-\dfrac{2}{5} and 0.10.1.

25=0.4-\dfrac{2}{5} = -0.4, which is negative, and 0.10.1 is positive. Every negative number is less than every positive number.

Answer: 25<0.1-\dfrac{2}{5} < 0.1 and 0.1>250.1 > -\dfrac{2}{5}

Guided practice

  1. Using the number line figure in this lesson, which is greater, 74-\dfrac{7}{4} or 0.5-0.5? How does the picture show it?
  2. Which is farther to the right on a number line, 2.5-2.5 or 2.05-2.05?
  3. Fill in <<, >>, or ==: 1.2    1.02-1.2 \ \underline{\ \ } \ -1.02
  4. Fill in <<, >>, or ==: 34    0.75\dfrac{3}{4} \ \underline{\ \ } \ 0.75
  5. Rewrite 25<0.1-\dfrac{2}{5} < 0.1 using the >> symbol.

Independent practice

  1. Fill in <<, >>, or ==: a) 0.8    45-0.8 \ \underline{\ \ } \ -\dfrac{4}{5} b) 112    1.451\dfrac{1}{2} \ \underline{\ \ } \ 1.45 c) 38    0.4-\dfrac{3}{8} \ \underline{\ \ } \ -0.4 d) 85%    0.85085\% \ \underline{\ \ } \ 0.850
  2. Name a rational number that lies between 0.5-0.5 and 0.25-0.25, and explain where it sits on the number line.
  3. Which is greater, 72-\dfrac{7}{2} or 3.45-3.45? Explain what the number line shows.
  4. Rewrite each statement the other way: a) 1.75<1.7-1.75 < -1.7 b) 25>0.375\dfrac{2}{5} > 0.375
  5. Which of these are false? Correct each false one: a) 0.6>0.06-0.6 > -0.06 b) 12=50%\dfrac{1}{2} = 50\% c) 214<2.4-2\dfrac{1}{4} < -2.4
  6. Application. On Tuesday the temperature changed by 1.5-1.5°C and on Wednesday by 114-1\dfrac{1}{4}°C. Write a comparison using a symbol, and state which day's change was greater.
  7. Reasoning. Explain why 0.50.5, 0.500.50, and 0.5000.500 all occupy the same point on a number line, and why padding a decimal with zeros is safe.

Exit ticket 2.3

  1. Fill in <<, >>, or ==: 1.6    1.06-1.6 \ \underline{\ \ } \ -1.06
  2. Fill in <<, >>, or ==: 78    0.875\dfrac{7}{8} \ \underline{\ \ } \ 0.875
  3. Which is greater, 54-\dfrac{5}{4} or 1.3-1.3?
  4. Explain how a number line decides a comparison between a negative fraction and a negative decimal.

Lesson 2.4 — Ordering a Set of Rational Numbers

From two numbers to four

Ordering means arranging a set of numbers by size. Ascending order runs from least to greatest; descending order runs from greatest to least. In this course you will order sets of no more than four numbers, which is small enough to do carefully and by hand.

The reliable procedure is the same every time:

  1. Convert everything to one common form. Decimals are usually easiest, because place-value comparison is fast. Pad so all decimals have the same number of places.
  2. Sort the negatives, then zero, then the positives. Every negative is less than every positive, so half the work is often free.
  3. Read the sorted list back in the original forms. The question asked about 58\tfrac{5}{8}, so the answer says 58\tfrac{5}{8}, not 0.6250.625.
  4. Check the ends. Confirm that your first value really is the smallest and your last really is the largest.

Step 3 is the one students skip, and it costs points. Converting is your scratch work; the answer belongs in the language of the question.

Ordering with a model

A number line is more than a check — for many problems it is the fastest method, and it is one of the three ways the standard lets you justify an answer.

Four rational numbers ordered on a number line

The set {34, 0.25, 12, 1.25}\left\{ \dfrac{3}{4},\ 0.25,\ -\dfrac{1}{2},\ -1.25 \right\} is plotted here as 114-1\tfrac{1}{4}, 0.5-0.5, 14\tfrac{1}{4}, and 1121\tfrac{1}{2} would be. Reading left to right gives ascending order; reading right to left gives descending order. No arithmetic is required once the points are placed — the picture is the argument.

Justifying your answer

The standard asks you to justify solutions orally, in writing, or with a model. A justification is not "I converted them." A justification names the strategy and shows the evidence:

38=0.375\dfrac{3}{8} = 0.375 and 35%=0.3535\% = 0.35. Padding to thousandths, 0.375>0.3500.375 > 0.350, because the two numbers agree in the tenths place and 7>57 > 5 in the hundredths place. So 38>35%\dfrac{3}{8} > 35\%.

That is a complete written justification: a conversion, a comparison of specific place values, and a conclusion.

A warning about negatives

The single most common ordering error is treating negatives as if larger digits mean a larger number. Consider 0.3-0.3, 0.25-0.25, and 0.5-0.5. A student who sorts 25<3<525 < 3 < 5 writes 0.25-0.25, 0.3-0.3, 0.5-0.5 and calls it ascending. But that list is descending: 0.25-0.25 is the greatest of the three, because it is closest to zero. Correct ascending order is 0.5-0.5, 0.3-0.3, 0.25-0.25.

Whenever a set contains negatives, sort them by distance from zero and then reverse that part of the list.

Worked examples

Example 1 — Ascending with mixed forms

Order 0.40.4, 18\dfrac{1}{8}, 0.650.65, 12\dfrac{1}{2} from least to greatest.

Convert to decimals and pad to hundredths:

0.40,18=0.1250.125,0.65,12=0.500.40, \qquad \frac{1}{8} = 0.125 \rightarrow 0.125, \qquad 0.65, \qquad \frac{1}{2} = 0.50

Sorted: 0.1250.125, 0.400.40, 0.500.50, 0.650.65. Now translate back.

Answer: 18\dfrac{1}{8}, 0.40.4, 12\dfrac{1}{2}, 0.650.65

Example 2 — Descending with negatives

Order 12-\dfrac{1}{2}, 0.250.25, 1.25-1.25, 34\dfrac{3}{4} from greatest to least.

Convert: 0.5-0.5, 0.250.25, 1.25-1.25, 0.750.75. The positives are 0.750.75 and 0.250.25, so 0.750.75 leads. The negatives are 0.5-0.5 and 1.25-1.25; since 1.25>0.51.25 > 0.5, the value 1.25-1.25 is farther from zero and therefore last.

Sorted descending: 0.750.75, 0.250.25, 0.5-0.5, 1.25-1.25.

Answer: 34\dfrac{3}{4}, 0.250.25, 12-\dfrac{1}{2}, 1.25-1.25

Example 3 — Four values close together

Order 60%60\%, 58\dfrac{5}{8}, 0.5750.575, 23\dfrac{2}{3} from least to greatest.

Convert everything to thousandths:

60%=0.600,58=0.625,0.575,23=0.66660\% = 0.600, \qquad \frac{5}{8} = 0.625, \qquad 0.575, \qquad \frac{2}{3} = 0.666\ldots

Compare: 0.575<0.600<0.625<0.6660.575 < 0.600 < 0.625 < 0.666\ldots Note that 23\tfrac{2}{3} repeats forever, but the tenths place alone (66 versus 66) is not enough while the hundredths place (66 versus 22) settles it against 58\tfrac{5}{8}.

Answer: 0.5750.575, 60%60\%, 58\dfrac{5}{8}, 23\dfrac{2}{3}

Example 4 — All negative, descending

Order 0.75-0.75, 35-\dfrac{3}{5}, 0.8-0.8, 710-\dfrac{7}{10} from greatest to least.

Convert: 0.75-0.75, 0.6-0.6, 0.8-0.8, 0.7-0.7. Pad to hundredths: 0.75-0.75, 0.60-0.60, 0.80-0.80, 0.70-0.70.

Distance from zero, least to greatest: 0.600.60, 0.700.70, 0.750.75, 0.800.80. The one closest to zero is the greatest, so reverse nothing — read that list as is and attach the signs.

Answer: 35-\dfrac{3}{5}, 710-\dfrac{7}{10}, 0.75-0.75, 0.8-0.8

Example 5 — Ordering in context

Four packages weigh 2.52.5 lb, 2382\dfrac{3}{8} lb, 2.452.45 lb, and 2142\dfrac{1}{4} lb. List them from heaviest to lightest.

Every value starts with 22, so only the fraction part decides the order. Convert and pad to thousandths:

2.500,238=2.375,2.450,214=2.2502.500, \qquad 2\tfrac{3}{8} = 2.375, \qquad 2.450, \qquad 2\tfrac{1}{4} = 2.250

Descending: 2.5002.500, 2.4502.450, 2.3752.375, 2.2502.250.

Answer: 2.52.5 lb, 2.452.45 lb, 2382\dfrac{3}{8} lb, 2142\dfrac{1}{4} lb

Guided practice

  1. Order from least to greatest: 0.40.4, 18\dfrac{1}{8}, 0.650.65, 12\dfrac{1}{2}.
  2. Order from greatest to least: 12-\dfrac{1}{2}, 0.250.25, 1.25-1.25, 34\dfrac{3}{4}.
  3. Order from least to greatest: 60%60\%, 58\dfrac{5}{8}, 0.5750.575, 23\dfrac{2}{3}.
  4. Order from greatest to least: 0.75-0.75, 35-\dfrac{3}{5}, 0.8-0.8, 710-\dfrac{7}{10}.
  5. Take the four numbers from item 50 and describe where each one sits on a number line from 2-2 to 22 marked in fourths. Then read them off left to right.

Independent practice

  1. Order from least to greatest: 2-2, 14\dfrac{1}{4}, 0.3-0.3, 0.750.75.
  2. Order from greatest to least: 38\dfrac{3}{8}, 0.40.4, 35%35\%, 13\dfrac{1}{3}.
  3. Order from least to greatest: 112-1\dfrac{1}{2}, 1.05-1.05, 1.6-1.6, 114-1\dfrac{1}{4}.
  4. Order from greatest to least: 0.1020.102, 12%12\%, 18\dfrac{1}{8}, 0.090.09.
  5. Application. Four days' temperature change from normal was 1.5-1.5°C, 0.750.75°C, 0.25-0.25°C, and 1141\dfrac{1}{4}°C. Order them from coldest to warmest.
  6. Application. Four bags of flour weigh 2.52.5 lb, 2382\dfrac{3}{8} lb, 2.452.45 lb, and 2142\dfrac{1}{4} lb. Order them from heaviest to lightest, and explain in writing which single place value did the most work in your comparison.
  7. Reasoning. A student ordered 0.3-0.3, 0.25-0.25, and 0.5-0.5 as 0.25-0.25, 0.3-0.3, 0.5-0.5 and labeled it "ascending." Explain the mistake and give the correct ascending order.

Exit ticket 2.4

  1. Order from least to greatest: 0.60.6, 12\dfrac{1}{2}, 55%55\%, 0.480.48.
  2. Order from greatest to least: 14-\dfrac{1}{4}, 0.2-0.2, 0.35-0.35, 12-\dfrac{1}{2}.
  3. Order from least to greatest: 13\dfrac{1}{3}, 0.30.3, 35%35\%, 0.3030.303.
  4. Write a justification for your ordering in item 63. Name the strategy you used and show the evidence.

Chapter 2 Review

Vocabulary. rational number · proper fraction · improper fraction · mixed number · percent · repeating decimal · equivalent · benchmark · ordering · ascending order · descending order

Part A — Forms of a rational number (7.NS.2a)

  1. Write each as a decimal: a) 58\dfrac{5}{8} b) 34-\dfrac{3}{4} c) 2152\dfrac{1}{5} d) 72\dfrac{7}{2}
  2. Write each as a percent: a) 0.090.09 b) 35\dfrac{3}{5} c) 1141\dfrac{1}{4}
  3. Write each percent as a fraction in simplest form: a) 24%24\% b) 5%5\% c) 250%250\%
  4. Write 0.875-0.875 as a fraction in simplest form.
  5. Which of these are rational numbers: 11-11, 0.250.25, 49\dfrac{4}{9}, 0.3030030000.303003000\ldots (never ends, never repeats)?
  6. Write 1381\dfrac{3}{8} as an improper fraction and as a decimal.

Part B — Comparing with benchmarks, equivalency, and symbols (7.NS.2a)

  1. Fill in <<, >>, or ==: a) 58    0.6\dfrac{5}{8} \ \underline{\ \ } \ 0.6 b) 25    0.35-\dfrac{2}{5} \ \underline{\ \ } \ -0.35 c) 34    75%\dfrac{3}{4} \ \underline{\ \ } \ 75\% d) 118    1.2-1\dfrac{1}{8} \ \underline{\ \ } \ -1.2
  2. Greater than or less than 12\dfrac{1}{2}? a) 47\dfrac{4}{7} b) 1124\dfrac{11}{24} c) 0.4990.499 d) 51%51\%
  3. Compare 712\dfrac{7}{12} and 59\dfrac{5}{9} using a common denominator. Show the equivalent fractions.
  4. Which is greater, 910-\dfrac{9}{10} or 0.85-0.85?
  5. Rewrite 0.35>130.35 > \dfrac{1}{3} using the << symbol.
  6. Name a rational number between 14\dfrac{1}{4} and 0.30.3, and show why it lies between them.

Part C — Ordering a set of four (7.NS.2a)

  1. Order from least to greatest: 0.70.7, 34\dfrac{3}{4}, 68%68\%, 58\dfrac{5}{8}.
  2. Order from greatest to least: 0.4-0.4, 13-\dfrac{1}{3}, 0.45-0.45, 38-\dfrac{3}{8}.
  3. Order from least to greatest: 1.5-1.5, 12\dfrac{1}{2}, 0.75-0.75, 1.051.05.
  4. Order from greatest to least: 1141\dfrac{1}{4}, 1.0251.025, 130%130\%, 1.21.2.

Part D — Mixed application and reasoning

  1. Application. Four long jumps measured 3.253.25 m, 3183\dfrac{1}{8} m, 3.43.4 m, and 3123\dfrac{1}{2} m. Order them from longest to shortest.
  2. Application. A checking account showed four changes in one week: $12.50-\$12.50, $8.75\$8.75, $12.05-\$12.05, and $3.40-\$3.40. Order them from least to greatest, then state which change hurt the balance most and explain why that is not the same as the least value being "smallest in size."
  3. Reasoning. A student says 0.5>0.45-0.5 > -0.45 because 50>4550 > 45. Explain the error and write the correct comparison.
  4. Justify in writing. Describe two different strategies for comparing 58\dfrac{5}{8} and 0.60.6, carry each one out, and confirm that they agree.
  5. Justify with a model. Describe a number line from 2-2 to 22 marked in fourths, and use it to place 114-1\dfrac{1}{4}, 0.5-0.5, 0.250.25, and 1121\dfrac{1}{2}. Then state the ascending order and explain how the picture proves it.

Standards coverage check — Chapter 2

Knowledge and Skill Where it is taught Where it is practiced
7.NS.2a — recognize rational numbers and write them as integers, proper and improper fractions, mixed numbers, decimals, and percents (positive and negative) 2.1 Items 1–16; Review Part A, items 65–70
7.NS.2a — compare using multiple strategies: benchmarks and equivalency 2.2 Items 17–32; Review Part B, items 71–74, 84
7.NS.2a — compare using a number line and the symbols <<, >>, == 2.3 Items 33–48; Review Part B, items 71, 74–76
7.NS.2a — order a set of no more than four rational numbers, ascending or descending 2.4 Items 49–63; Review Part C, items 77–80; items 81, 82
7.NS.2a — justify solutions orally, in writing, or with a model 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 Items 27, 28, 32, 39, 40, 44, 48, 53, 59, 60, 64; Review items 82–85

Decimals throughout this chapter are limited to the thousandths place, and every ordering set contains no more than four numbers, as the standard requires.

Answer keys for every set in this chapter are in Appendix A.