Appendix A — Answer Key, Chapter 1: Subsets of the Real Number System
SOL 8.NS.2 · Covers textbook Chapter 1 and the companion workbook. Item numbers match the textbook; workbook items are the same problems, so this key serves both. Item numbers run continuously from 1 to 102 across the chapter. Reasoning answers show an acceptable response, not the only wording.
Convention used throughout: "name every subset" means list all of natural, whole, integer, rational, irrational, and real that apply. Every number in this chapter is real, so "real" appears in every complete answer, and no answer ever contains both "rational" and "irrational."
Lesson 1.1 — Counting Numbers, Whole Numbers, and Integers
Guided practice
- Only . Counting starts at , so is not natural, and is negative.
- and . The whole numbers are the naturals together with .
- All three: , , and . The integers add the opposites of the whole numbers, and is the opposite of .
- . It is the only whole number that is not a natural number.
- Any negative integer, such as .
- The integers were built from the whole numbers, which were built from the naturals, and each step only added members, so every natural number is still there.
Independent practice
- a) : natural, whole, integer b) : whole, integer c) : integer d) : natural, whole, integer
- a) False. is a whole number but not a natural number. b) False. is an integer but not a whole number. c) True. The whole numbers are the naturals together with , so nothing was removed. d) True. is a whole number, and every whole number is an integer.
- a) Any negative integer, such as . b) Any number with a fractional part, such as or .
- whole numbers
- The integers contain . It is not natural and not whole, because both of those subsets contain only and the positive counting numbers, and is negative.
- The integers. The whole numbers are not enough because is negative, and the whole numbers contain no negative numbers. Every label has no fractional part and is either a whole number or the opposite of one, so the integers are the smallest of the three subsets that holds them all.
- Counting objects starts with one object, so the counting numbers begin at and never need . But you often need to report that a collection is empty — zero apples, zero points — and that report needs a number of its own, so was added to make the whole numbers.
- Having no fraction part is not the test for a whole number; the whole numbers are and contain no negatives. Since is the opposite of the whole number , it is an integer.
Exit ticket 1.1
- Not natural; yes whole; yes integer.
- Any negative integer, such as or .
- Natural, whole, and integer.
- The integers include every whole number and also the opposite of each one, so the integers contain negative numbers and the whole numbers do not. Both exclude fractions and decimals with a fractional part.
Lesson 1.2 — Rational Numbers
Guided practice
- (any equivalent ratio of integers, such as , is acceptable).
- ; it terminates, because the long division reaches a remainder of .
- ; it repeats.
- Yes. is a perfect square, so .
- Yes. .
- Yes. , and and are both integers with the denominator not zero. The definition allows the numerator to be negative.
Independent practice
- a) : natural, whole, integer b) : whole, integer c) : integer d) : none of the Lesson 1.1 subsets e) : none of the Lesson 1.1 subsets
- a) b) c) d) e)
- a) , terminates b) , repeats c) , terminates d) , repeats
- Rational: (it equals ), (a terminating decimal, ), and (equal to ). Not rational: , since is not a perfect square, and , whose decimal never terminates or repeats — both are irrational.
- A rational number is any number that can be written as a ratio of two integers with a nonzero denominator. Given any integer , write : the numerator is an integer, the denominator is an integer, and . So every integer satisfies the definition.
- Yes, rational. . It is not an integer, because it has a fractional part and lies between and .
- . It is rational and real, and nothing else — it is not an integer, whole number, or natural number.
- Never ending is not the test. The test is whether the decimal terminates or repeats; either one makes the number rational. repeats, and in fact , a ratio of two integers. It is rational and real.
Exit ticket 1.2
- Yes. .
- Yes. is a perfect square, so , which is .
- A repeating decimal can always be rewritten as a fraction of two integers — for instance and — and being writable as such a fraction is exactly the definition of rational. What would make a decimal irrational is never terminating and never repeating.
Lesson 1.3 — Irrational Numbers
Guided practice
- Rational. is a perfect square and .
- Irrational. is not a perfect square — it lies between and — so , a decimal that never terminates and never repeats.
- Irrational. never terminates and never repeats.
- Irrational. It never terminates, and it has no block of digits that repeats.
- Between and , since and .
- Example: (or , or ). Non-example: , because it equals the rational number . (Any terminating or repeating decimal is also an acceptable non-example.)
Independent practice
- a) rational, b) irrational, is not a perfect square c) rational, d) irrational, is not a perfect square e) rational, terminates and equals
- The closest perfect squares are below and above, so and lies between and . It is much closer to , because is much closer to than to .
- False. The square root of a perfect square is rational: , and .
- a) , terminates b) , neither c) , repeats d) terminates
- goes on forever with no repeating block. Every ratio of two integers produces a decimal that either stops or falls into a repeating block, because long division has only finitely many possible remainders and one must eventually come back around. Since the decimal for does neither, no ratio of integers can produce it.
- Irrational, because is not a perfect square. Since , the side length is between and feet.
- is irrational, so its decimal never terminates and never repeats; multiplying by shifts the digits but cannot create an ending or a repeating block, so is irrational too. The value is what you get from replacing with the rational approximation . It is a terminating decimal, , and so it is a rational number close to the exact circumference but not equal to it.
- First error: does not equal . The two disagree at the third decimal place, since while ; is only an approximation. Second error: even if a number is close to a fraction, that does not make it rational. Rational means the number equals a ratio of two integers, and equals no such ratio, because its decimal never terminates and never repeats.
Exit ticket 1.3
- Rational. is a perfect square, so .
- Irrational, since is not a perfect square. Because , it lies between and .
- Example: (or , , ). Non-example: , which equals and is rational.
- Write the number in decimal form. If the decimal terminates or repeats, the number is rational, because both kinds can be written as a ratio of two integers. If the decimal never terminates and never repeats, the number is irrational. Both conditions matter: never ends but repeats, so it is rational.
Lesson 1.4 — The Whole System: Nesting and Classifying
Guided practice
- : natural, whole, integer, rational, real
- : whole, integer, rational, real (not natural)
- : integer, rational, real
- : rational, real
- : natural, whole, integer, rational, real
- : irrational, real
- : rational, real (it equals )
- : irrational, real
Independent practice
- Completed table.
| Number | Natural | Whole | Integer | Rational | Irrational | Real |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | |
| no | no | yes | yes | no | yes | |
| no | no | no | yes | no | yes | |
| yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | |
| no | no | no | no | yes | yes |
Note the last two rows: , a natural number, while is not a perfect square, so is irrational.
- a) (any negative integer) b) , or , or c) , , or any irrational number d) , the only such number e) , , , or any counting number
- a) True. The rationals are one of the two regions inside the real numbers. b) False. is real but not rational. c) True. The definitions are opposites: a number either can be written as a ratio of two integers or cannot, so the two regions do not overlap. d) False. Every integer equals , so every integer is rational and no integer is irrational. e) True. Every whole number is an integer, and every integer equals .
- goes in the integer region but outside the whole numbers. goes in the rational region but outside the integers. goes in the natural number region, the innermost one. goes in the irrational region. goes in the whole number region but outside the naturals.
- Rational means the number can be written as a ratio of two integers with a nonzero denominator. Irrational means it cannot. A single number cannot both be able and unable to be written that way, so the two subsets share no members. In the diagram this is why the two regions sit side by side with no overlap.
- : natural, whole, integer, rational, real. : integer, rational, real. : rational, real. : irrational, real. All four are real numbers, since every one of them has a location on the number line.
- , which is natural, whole, an integer, rational, and real. is irrational and real, because is not a perfect square; it lies between and , since . Only the first tile has a side that can be measured exactly in whole centimeters: cm.
- Drawing the irrationals inside the rationals claims that every irrational number can be written as a ratio of two integers, which is the exact opposite of the definition of irrational. It is false: and are irrational, and neither equals any ratio of two integers. The irrational region belongs beside the rational region, both inside the real numbers.
Exit ticket 1.4
- : integer, rational, real
- : natural, whole, integer, rational, real
- : irrational, real. ( is not a perfect square; it lies between and , so the value is between and .)
- The natural numbers sit inside the whole numbers, inside the integers, inside the rationals, inside the reals, so every natural number is carried all the way out to the real numbers. The reverse fails because the outer regions contain numbers the inner one does not: , , and are all real but none of them is a counting number.
Chapter 1 Review
Part A — Relationships among the subsets (8.NS.2a)
- The sketch should match
fig2-subset-diagram.png: one large region labeled Real Numbers; inside it two non-overlapping regions labeled Rational Numbers and Irrational Numbers; and inside the rational region three strictly nested regions labeled Integers, then Whole Numbers, then Natural Numbers. Credit requires the nesting order to be right and the irrational region to be separate from the rational region. - a) whole (also integer, rational, and real are acceptable) b) integer c) rational d) real
- Because no number is both rational and irrational. A rational number can be written as a ratio of two integers and an irrational number cannot, so the two collections share no members and their regions cannot overlap. Both are drawn inside the real numbers, since every rational and every irrational number has a location on the number line.
- : natural region. : whole region, outside the naturals. : integer region, outside the whole numbers. : rational region, outside the integers. : irrational region.
- True. The integers were formed from the whole numbers by adding the opposite of each one, so every whole number is still an integer. The reverse is not true, since is an integer and not a whole number.
- The line should show solid points at . Any non-integer rational is acceptable for the second mark, such as or . For the irrational between and , is the natural choice; also works. The irrational mark must fall strictly between and and must not land on a tick mark.
- Each of the three number lines marks a collection of numbers, and every point marked on the natural-number line is also marked on the whole-number line, which in turn is fully marked on the integer line. That is what "subset" means: every member of the smaller collection is also a member of the larger one. It does not run backwards — the integer line marks points, such as , that the other two do not.
Part B — Classifying numbers and explaining why (8.NS.2b)
- a) : natural, whole, integer, rational, real b) : integer, rational, real c) : whole, integer, rational, real d) : rational, real e) : rational, real (it equals )
- a) : natural, whole, integer, rational, real b) : irrational, real c) : integer, rational, real d) : rational, real e) : irrational, real
- is a perfect square, since , so . Eleven is a counting number, so it is a natural number — and therefore also whole, an integer, rational, and real.
- is not a perfect square: it falls between and , so falls between and and is not a whole number. Its decimal, , never terminates and never repeats, so it cannot be written as a ratio of two integers.
- No. The whole numbers are and contain no negative numbers, and is negative. It is the opposite of the whole number , so the smallest subset in the diagram containing it is the integers.
- terminates, so the number is rational and real, and nothing narrower — it is not an integer. As a ratio: .
- Irrational and real. The decimal never terminates and never repeats, so the number cannot be written as a ratio of two integers. (This number is .)
- The natural numbers are the counting numbers , and counting does not start at , so is not natural. The complete classification of is whole, integer, rational, and real.
Part C — Describing each subset with examples and non-examples (8.NS.2c)
- The natural numbers are the counting numbers: , going on forever, with no zero, no negatives, and no fractional parts. Examples: and . Non-examples: , because counting starts at ; and , because it is negative. (, which is not a whole amount, is also acceptable.)
- The whole numbers are the natural numbers together with : . Examples: and . Non-examples: (negative) and (has a fractional part).
- The integers are the whole numbers together with their opposites: — every number with no fractional part, positive, negative, or zero. Examples: and . Non-examples: and , both of which have fractional parts.
- The rational numbers are the numbers that can be written as a ratio of two integers with ; equivalently, the numbers whose decimal form terminates or repeats. Examples: the fraction , the decimal (or the repeating decimal ), and the radical , which equals . Non-examples: and , whose decimals never terminate and never repeat.
- The irrational numbers are the real numbers that cannot be written as a ratio of two integers; their decimals never terminate and never repeat. Examples: and . Non-examples: , which equals ; and , which terminates. (, which repeats, is also acceptable.)
- One acceptable completion.
| Subset | Example | Non-example |
|---|---|---|
| Natural numbers | (counting starts at ) | |
| Whole numbers | (negative) | |
| Integers | (has a fractional part) | |
| Rational numbers | (never terminates or repeats) | |
| Irrational numbers | (equals ) |
Part D — Mixed application and reasoning
- is not a perfect square, so is irrational and real. Since , the side length lies between and feet, closer to . The builder writes feet because the exact value never ends, and a saw and tape measure cannot use an unending decimal; is a rational approximation accurate enough to cut the patio.
- is rational and real. Its decimal terminates, and . It is not an integer because it has a fractional part — half a dollar — so it sits strictly between the integers and on the number line.
- No. Every integer can be written as , a ratio of two integers, so every integer is rational. An irrational number is by definition one that cannot be written as such a ratio. In the diagram, the integer region lies entirely inside the rational region, and the rational and irrational regions do not overlap, so nothing can be in both.
- The radical sign says "take the square root," and that operation gives a rational result whenever the number underneath is a perfect square. , a natural number and therefore rational. By contrast is not a perfect square — it falls between and — so never terminates or repeats and is irrational. The test is the number under the radical, not the radical sign.
- is irrational, and multiplying it by cannot make its decimal stop or fall into a repeating block, so the exact area square inches is irrational. The value comes from replacing with the rational approximation , since . That result is a terminating decimal, equal to , so it is rational — and it is close to the exact area without equaling it.
Workbook-only items
Page 2, fill in the blanks. The natural numbers are also called the counting numbers. The whole numbers are the naturals together with . The integers are the whole numbers together with their opposites. The symbol is read "is a subset of." The chain is .
Page 2, circle table. Row 1 (natural): circle only. Row 2 (whole): circle and . Row 3 (integers): circle , , and .
Page 6, fill in the frames. , , (any nonzero integer denominator works for ). A decimal that ends is a terminating decimal. A decimal with a block repeating forever is a repeating decimal. Before classifying a radical, always simplify it first.
Page 10, fill in the frames. terminates, so it is rational. repeats, so it is rational. never terminates and never repeats, so it is irrational. The trapping frame is . The comparison frame is , which differs from at the third decimal place.
Page 14, labeling and chain. Labels from outside in: Real Numbers; then Rational Numbers beside Irrational Numbers; then Integers, Whole Numbers, and Natural Numbers nested inside the rationals. The chain is . The irrational region is drawn beside the rational region, never inside it, because no number is both.
Page 21, item 92 frame. The natural numbers are the counting numbers , with no zero, no negatives, and no fractional parts. See item 92 above for examples and non-examples.
Page 23, item 101 frames. , which is a natural number, and so rational. is irrational, because is not a perfect square, so its decimal never terminates and never repeats.