Appendix A — Answer Key, Chapter 10: The Laws of Exponents
SOL A.EO.3 (a, b) · Covers textbook Chapter 10 and the companion workbook. Item numbers match the textbook; workbook items are the same problems, so this key serves both. Item numbers run continuously from 1 to 126 across the chapter. Reasoning answers show an acceptable response, not the only wording.
Conventions used in every answer below. In , is the base, is the exponent, and the whole thing is a power. The exponent reaches only the symbol it sits on, so while . A bare variable is read as exponent . Final answers use positive exponents, so is reported as rather than . Every law derived from a quotient carries ; the restriction is stated where it is the point of the item and assumed silently elsewhere. is undefined. All exponents anywhere in this chapter are integers — no answer uses a fractional exponent or a radical.
The laws, for reference:
The figures used repeatedly in the chapter:
- Figure 1 derives the product law by counting a row of factors: as five s, braced , , and
- Figure 2 derives the quotient law by striking off matched pairs: with two pairs canceled and three factors left over
- Figure 3 forces — a table stepping down to by repeated division by , beside read two ways
- Figure 4 forces — the same column continued to , beside read two ways
- Figure 5 derives by counting groups: as three groups of two factors
- Figure 6 derives from and from
- Figure 7 separates from across six expressions
- Figure 8 is the powers-of-ten scale from to , in meters
- Figure 9 is the cell-division table, cells after hours, hours through
- Figure 10 is the pair of blank pattern tables for student work
Lesson 10.1 — Powers and the Product Law
Guided practice
- The row is . The blue brace counts the 3 factors that came from ; the red brace counts the 2 factors that came from ; the black brace over the top counts 5 factors in all. The single power is .
- . The count is , so the single power is .
- Because the only thing happening is counting. is a row of three copies of and is a row of two copies; setting one row after the other makes one row of five copies, and is how many copies are standing there. The exponent is a tally of factors, so putting two tallies together adds them.
- . Check: , and . They agree.
- , since .
- , and . The parentheses decide the base: in the first, the whole number is squared; in the second, only the is squared and the minus sign is applied afterward.
Independent practice
- a) () b) () c) , reading as , so d) () — the exponents add even when they are equal; this is not
- a) b) c) d) — two negative coefficients multiply to a positive one
- a) b) c) d)
- There is nothing to count together. is three copies of multiplied by four copies of , and those are different bases, so no single tally describes the whole product. It stays . Writing would claim seven copies of the pair — that is, seven s and seven s — which is a different expression entirely. At , : the original is , and .
- ; ; ; . The first pair agrees and the second does not. The parentheses matter whenever the exponent is even: an even power of a negative base is positive, while is negative whatever is. At an odd exponent the two forms happen to agree, which is exactly why checking the rule once with an odd exponent misleads.
- Total bytes , by the product law, since . As an ordinary number, bytes.
- because an exponent counts how many copies of the base are multiplied, and one copy of is just . The product law needs it because carries an invisible exponent of : the count in is . A student who treats the bare as having no exponent has nothing to add, and either leaves the answer as or writes , losing a factor.
- The student multiplied the exponents instead of adding them. The product law adds, because the two rows of factors are laid end to end. Correct: . The count settles it — is seven s, not twelve.
- The student squared , but no parentheses were written, so the exponent sits on the alone. . The expression whose value is is .
- a) , since , so the missing exponent is b) , since , so the missing exponent is c) , since , so the missing exponent is
Exit ticket 10.1
- ; the parentheses make the base. ; here the base is and the minus sign is applied to the finished power.
- The product law counts copies of one base, so there must be one base to count. In there are three copies of and four copies of ; adding would claim seven copies of something, and there is no single thing there are seven of. When bases differ, each is tallied separately and the expression stays a product: .
Lesson 10.2 — The Quotient Law
Guided practice
- . Two pairs are struck through, one for each factor in the denominator. Three factors are left over on top, which the brace labels. The single power is , and the count is .
- Four pairs cancel and three s remain, so and the single power is .
- , and . The agreement confirms that subtracting the exponents produced the right number, not merely a plausible-looking symbol — the law was derived by counting, and the arithmetic independently agrees with the count.
- , since four pairs cancel and five factors remain: . (For .)
- If , then and the expression has a denominator of zero, which names no number — there is no value with when is also , and no value at all when it is not. So the law is a claim about every base except zero, and the restriction has to be stated rather than assumed.
Independent practice
- a) () b) () c) , reading the denominator as , so d) ()
- a) b) c) — the coefficient fraction reduces to and stays a fraction; nothing requires it to come out whole d) — two negatives divide to a positive
- a) b) , reading the lone as c) d)
- . The stadium holds about times as many people as the auditorium — two orders of magnitude more.
- images, which is images.
- Every canceled pair is one factor divided by itself, and a factor over itself is — so removing a pair changes nothing about the value while removing one factor from the top count and one from the bottom count. In there are two factors on the bottom, so exactly two pairs can be matched off, and factors are left. The subtraction is simply the record of how many pairings were possible; it is bookkeeping for the canceling, not a separate rule.
- The student divided the exponents, , instead of subtracting them. Correct: . Counting leftovers settles it: two of the eight top factors pair off with the two bottom factors, leaving six on top.
- The student subtracted the coefficients, , instead of dividing them. Coefficients are divided, because they are numbers being divided; exponents are subtracted, because they are counts of paired-off factors. Correct: .
- a) , since , so the missing exponent is b) , since , so the missing exponent is c) , since , so the missing exponent is
- When : every factor on top pairs off with one on the bottom, so nothing is left over at all. The count is . When : all top factors pair off, and there are factors left over on the bottom, below the bar. The count is negative, and its size says how many unmatched factors remain in the denominator. In both cases the counting still works perfectly; what it produces is an exponent of or a negative exponent, and Lesson 10.3 settles what those have to mean.
Exit ticket 10.2
- , which is . (Checking directly: .)
- Because the law has in a denominator, and a denominator of zero names no number. If then and the quotient is meaningless, so the derivation — matching factors off in pairs, each pair worth — never applies at . Every consequence of the law inherits the same exception, including and .
Lesson 10.3 — Zero and Negative Exponents
Guided practice
Power Value From the row above — Every entry in the right-hand column is the same instruction: step down one exponent, divide by . That is what dropping one factor of means.
By the quotient law, . By canceling all three pairs, . Therefore , for every . It cannot be otherwise because the same expression cannot equal two different things: both readings are legitimate — one uses the quotient law, the other uses only that a factor over itself is — so the two answers are the same number. Nothing was chosen; the value was forced.
The hour- column is boxed. It records cell, and the power sitting in it is . It is a real moment because hour is when the observation begins and nothing has divided yet — there genuinely is one cell — so is a headcount in this table rather than a bookkeeping convention.
, , and for every . The law does not care what the base is, only that it is not zero; whatever number happens to be, it is being raised to the zero power.
Power Value As a decimal From the row above The instruction is unchanged from the rows above : divide by .
By the quotient law, . By canceling the two pairs, — the two top factors match two of the bottom five, and three unmatched factors remain below the bar. So for every .
Both are derived from a quotient. The argument for divides by , and the argument for divides by ; neither division is allowed when , so neither conclusion reaches that base. is left undefined because two patterns disagree there and nothing breaks the tie: reading along the exponents, for every nonzero , which suggests ; reading along the bases, for every positive , which suggests . Rather than invent an answer no pattern forces, this course declines to assign one.
Independent practice
a) b) (which is ) c) . The value is negative because the base is negative and the exponent is odd — not because the exponent is negative. d) . An exponent of is exactly "take the reciprocal."
a) . Entered as
2^(-3), or as . b) . Entered as5^(-2). c) . Entered as10^(-4).In all three cases the calculator returns a positive number smaller than , which is the fastest possible refutation of reading a negative exponent as a negative number.
a) b) — only the moves, because the exponent sits on the alone c) — a negative exponent in a denominator moves up and turns positive d) — both cross the bar, in opposite directions
a) b) c) d)
a) b) . Note : subtracting a negative exponent adds. c) d) . Both special exponents appear: contributed nothing to the front, and removed entirely.
The exponent sits on the alone, so only the moves across the bar; the coefficient is a separate factor and stays in the numerator. Hence . At : the correct form gives , while . The two are not the same expression, and one substitution shows it.
The hour- column records cell because hour is the moment the observation begins and no division has happened yet — there is still the one original cell. After hours there are cells, as the last column of the figure shows. After hours there are cells, which is .
megabyte, which is megabyte. Since , eight thumbnails fit in one megabyte. (Equivalently, .)
The right-hand column of that table says the same thing on every row: divide by . The row above is , so the value at is . For to be , the pattern would have to abandon dividing by at exactly that row and start doing something else — negating and doubling — with no reason given, and then presumably do something different again at the next row. Nothing in the arithmetic justifies that. The pattern was already running before , and it keeps running through it.
Take one expression, , and read it two legitimate ways. The quotient law gives . Canceling all three pairs gives , using nothing but the fact that a factor over itself is . Since one expression has one value, and are the same number. No convention was adopted; the value was the only one available. The restriction enters because both readings are readings of a quotient with in the denominator — at that denominator is and the expression names nothing, so the argument says nothing about .
Two mistakes. First, the student read the negative exponent as producing a negative number; a negative exponent produces a reciprocal, and all the values in the pattern below are positive. Second, the student multiplied the base by the exponent, treating as or similar, rather than counting factors. Correct: . The expression that really equals is .
The exponent counts factors; it is not the answer. An exponent of says no factors are being multiplied, and the value that leaves is , not . Correct: for every . The quotient that forces it is , which is by the quotient law and by canceling — two readings of one expression, so .
Two patterns disagree at . Along the exponents, for every nonzero base, which argues for . Along the bases, for every positive exponent — , , — which argues for . No value satisfies both. And the derivation of cannot break the tie, because it read the quotient two ways, and at the denominator is , so that quotient does not exist. With no pattern forcing an answer, is left undefined rather than assigned one by preference.
Exit ticket 10.3
- . . — positive, because the base is raised to an even power.
- . The moves down and the moves up; the coefficient does not move.
- and . The single rule is: step down one exponent, divide by . It produces from , from , from , and from , without changing at any row.
- Read two ways: the quotient law gives , and canceling all three matched pairs gives . One expression cannot have two values, so must be — the value is forced by a law already derived, not adopted by agreement.
Lesson 10.4 — Powers of Bases
Guided practice
- . The brace counts 3 groups of 2 factors, so 6 factors. The single power is .
- is 3 groups of 4 factors each, so factors and the single power is .
- , and . The agreement confirms that multiplying the exponents produced the right number — the count of groups times factors per group is genuinely the total factor count, not just a plausible-looking rule.
- , then regrouping gives , which is . The boxed law is . The regrouping step is the derivation, and it is allowed because multiplication can be reordered.
- , then multiplying across gives . The boxed law is , for . The restriction is there because sits in a denominator throughout, and a denominator of zero names no number.
- : two separate rows of factors are laid end to end, so the two counts add. : one row of two factors is repeated three times, so the answer is groups factors per group, and the counts multiply. Different pictures give different arithmetic, and writing the factors out tells you which picture you have every time.
Independent practice
- a) b) (which is ) c) d) — or all at once,
- a) — the coefficient takes the exponent too b) ; negative because the exponent is odd c) d) ; positive because the exponent is even
- a) b) c) d)
- a) b) — the coefficient took the negative exponent as well, so ended up underneath c) — a negative exponent on a fraction flips it d)
- Volume cubic centimeters. Two laws: power of a product, to send the outer exponent to both the and the , and power of a power, to turn into .
- A square kilometer is square meters, which is . The law is power of a power. (This is why doubling a length quadruples an area — the exponent on the length gets multiplied, not the length itself.)
- is true because the derivation reorders factors: can be regrouped as since multiplication may be done in any order. In there are no factors to reorder, so that step has nothing to act on and the analogous claim fails. Counterexample at , , : the left side is , and the right side is . One counterexample retires the claim permanently. (What actually equals is Chapter 12's work.)
- The student sent the exponent to the but not to the . Every factor inside the parentheses takes the exponent, coefficient included: . At : the correct answer gives , and the student's gives .
- The student used the product law, adding , on an expression that is a power of a power. Correct: . The count is groups of factors, so twelve factors in all — not seven.
- a) , since , so the missing exponent is b) , so the missing exponent is ; both the coefficient and the variable confirm it, since and c) , so the missing exponents are and
Exit ticket 10.4
- ; negative because the exponent is odd
- : two rows of factors are set end to end, so the counts add — three copies of followed by five copies is eight copies. : one row of three factors is repeated five times, so the counts multiply — five groups of three is fifteen factors. In the first, factors are being joined; in the second, a group is being repeated.
Lesson 10.5 — Multivariable Expressions and Ratios of Monomials
Guided practice
- One step to the right multiplies the value by ; one step to the left divides it by — the same single pattern in both directions, which is what makes the negative side of the scale no different in kind from the positive side. At the value is , marked on the figure, and the everyday length labeled there is one meter, one long stride.
- . A kilometer is one million times as long as a millimeter — six orders of magnitude, which is the six ticks between the two callouts.
- . The base had the larger exponent underneath, so its leftover factors really are in the denominator.
- . Clearing the outer exponent must come first, and it has to reach the as well as the : , not .
- . On the base the subtraction is ; writing the parentheses is what keeps it from being read as .
- A monomial is a number, a variable, or a product of numbers and variables — for example , , . is not a monomial, because a variable appears in a denominator, which makes it a quotient of two monomials rather than a single product. It is, however, exactly the kind of thing that a simplified ratio of monomials comes out as.
Independent practice
a) b) c) d)
a) . Clear the outer exponent first — — then use the product law. b) . The coefficients happen to cancel exactly, which is easy to miss if the outer exponents are not both cleared first. c) . Simplifying inside first is much shorter than cubing top and bottom and dividing afterward, though both give the same answer. d)
a) . The base vanished because . b) c) d)
Front numbers: . Exponents: . So the ratio is : about twenty thousand times as many people live in the country as in the town.
. The Richmond-to-Chicago distance is about a billion times the thickness of a credit card, and the two lengths are nine orders of magnitude apart — the nine ticks between and on the scale.
, which is photos.
. Step 1, power of a product: the outer exponent reaches both factors, giving . Step 2, power of a power: , so the numerator is . Step 3, quotient law: divide the coefficients, , and subtract the exponents, . Result: .
by the quotient law, and by the negative-exponent law — which itself came from counting the four unmatched factors left below the bar in . So all three are the same quantity at every . This chapter reports , because the convention is that a final answer contains no negative exponent; the form with a positive exponent also shows at a glance that the value is a small positive number when is large.
On the base the student subtracted in the wrong direction, computing instead of , and then left the result in the numerator. The subtraction is always numerator exponent minus denominator exponent, and a negative result means the leftover factors are in the denominator. Correct: . A check at , would not catch this; at , the original is , the correct answer gives , and the student's gives .
The student subtracted the exponents as instead of , dropping the sign on the denominator's exponent. Subtracting a negative adds: . Correct: . Written another way, , so the denominator's contributes an extra factor of upstairs.
At , : the original is , and the simplified form is . At , : the original is , and the simplified form is . All four values: , , , .
Agreement at two pairs is not a proof because two expressions can agree at finitely many points and differ elsewhere — the check confirms nothing about the infinitely many pairs not tried. But a disagreement at even one allowed pair would be a proof of error, because a correct simplification has to equal the original at every allowed value; a single counterexample is enough to rule it out. That asymmetry is why the check is worth thirty seconds even though it proves nothing on its own. (Testing alone would be a poor check, since to any power is and most exponent errors survive it.)
Exit ticket 10.5
- Clear the outer exponent first. Doing so distributes one exponent to a handful of factors and multiplies a few inner exponents, after which the expression is an ordinary ratio of monomials and the remaining work is one division of coefficients and one subtraction per base. Leaving the outer exponent for last means carrying an unexpanded power through every other step and then still having to expand it, which is longer and gives the sign and coefficient errors more places to happen. (Simplifying inside the parentheses first is also correct and is sometimes shorter still, as in ; what must not happen is applying the quotient law across the bar while an uncleared outer exponent is still sitting over the whole fraction.)
Chapter 10 Review
Part A — Deriving the laws from patterns
The blue brace counts the 3 factors contributed by ; the red brace counts the 2 factors contributed by ; the black brace counts the 5 factors in all that result. The law is . The exponents add rather than multiply because an exponent is a tally of how many copies of the base are being multiplied, and setting one row of copies after another gives a row whose length is the sum of the two lengths.
The strikethrough marks show factors being matched off in pairs, one from the numerator with one from the denominator. Each canceled pair is a factor divided by itself, which is worth — so removing a pair leaves the value unchanged while shortening both counts by one. The law is , for .
Power Value From the row above — Reading 1, by the quotient law: . Reading 2, by canceling all three pairs: . So , for .
It is forced rather than chosen for two reasons that agree. The table's right-hand column is the same instruction at every row — step down one exponent, divide by — so the entry below has to be ; any other value would mean the pattern broke on the last step for no reason. And the two readings are readings of a single expression, which can only have one value, so and are the same number whether anyone agrees to it or not.
Power Value As a decimal Each comes from the row above by the same division by : and .
A negative exponent instructs you to take a reciprocal: . So cannot be , because the column's rule is "divide by ," and the row above is , giving . Every value below is a positive number smaller than ; for to be right, the pattern would have to abandon dividing by at exactly that row, with nothing to justify it.
. The outer exponent counts groups, and the inner exponent counts factors inside one group. They multiply because the total number of factors is groups times factors per group — the same arithmetic as counting rows of objects. In the figure, is three groups of two factors, so six factors, and is the result.
, and for . Left panel's numeric check, at : , and . Right panel's numeric check, at and : , and .
Expression Value Read as "the opposite of " — the exponent reaches only the symbol it sits on, and the minus sign is applied to the finished power. The two forms agree exactly when the exponent is odd, as with , because an odd power of a negative base is negative anyway. They cannot agree when the exponent is even: is then positive while is negative, as against . (The one uninteresting exception is , where both are .)
Part B — Multivariable expressions
a) b) c) d) , since and
a) — only the moves; the and the stay put b) c) d)
. . . .
The last two differ only in where the minus sign sits. In the parentheses make the base, and an even power of a negative number is positive. In the base is , the power is formed first, and the minus sign is applied to it afterward — giving the opposite. The sign of the answer is decided by the parentheses, not by the negative exponent, which only ever produces a reciprocal.
The student sent the outer exponent to the variables but not to the coefficient. Every factor inside takes the exponent: . The law applied to only part of the expression was the power of a product, — the student used it on and and skipped the . A check at exposes it: the correct answer is and the student's is .
Because a negative exponent is an instruction to take a reciprocal, not to negate. , and the reciprocal of a positive number is positive, so whenever . Nothing in the operation can introduce a minus sign; only a negative base can do that. Example: exactly, which is as a decimal — the same value the pattern column of Figure 4 produces, and the same value a calculator returns.
a) , so the missing exponent is b) , so the missing exponent is c) , so the missing exponent is
Part C — Ratios of monomial expressions
a) . The base paired off completely, and . b) c) d)
.
The base disappeared because its exponents were equal top and bottom: every in the numerator paired off with a in the denominator, leaving , and multiplying by changes nothing. It is worth writing the down before dropping it, so that the base is retired for a reason rather than by inattention.
At , : the original is , and the simplified form is . At , : the original is , and the simplified form is . All four values: , , , .
is not an allowed test value because appears in a denominator — in the original and in the answer — and a denominator of zero names no number. The equality is a claim about every allowed pair, and is precisely the pair the restriction excludes.
Work outward in. First clear the outer exponent, distributing it to every factor inside — coefficient included — and multiplying any inner exponents; alternatively, simplify inside the parentheses first, which is sometimes shorter. Then multiply within the numerator and within the denominator using the product law, divide the coefficients and reduce that fraction, subtract exponents base by base with the numerator's exponent first, and finally move any negative exponent across the bar so the answer has none.
Every one of those steps assumes each variable in the denominator is nonzero, because every step is either the quotient law or a consequence of it, and the quotient law is derived by canceling matched pairs — a factor divided by itself is only when that factor is not . The same restriction is what and inherit, since both were derived from a quotient. So the simplified expression equals the original at every value except the ones that would have put a zero underneath, and those values are excluded from the start rather than discovered at the end.
Part D — Mixed application
At the value is meter, and the figure labels it one long stride. A kilometer against a millimeter: , a million times as long. Richmond-to-Chicago against a credit card's thickness: , a billion times as long — nine orders of magnitude, which is the nine ticks between the two callouts.
The law is the quotient law, . The answers depend on a negative exponent meaning a reciprocal because both subtractions cross zero: and only come out to and if really is , a small positive length. If a negative exponent meant a negative number instead, would be a negative length, and dividing by it would give a negative ratio — which is not what "how many times as long" can ever mean. The scale is the whole argument drawn in one line: one step left divides by , on both sides of .
At hour there is cell, recorded as . At hour there are cells. At hour there are cells, which is .
. That number says the colony at hour is times the size it was at hour — and it is the same as the hour- count itself, because six more hours of doubling multiplies by no matter when those six hours start. (How that constant multiplier makes this an exponential function is Chapter 17's subject.)
Front numbers: . Exponents: . So the quotient is , which is not yet in scientific notation because is less than ; shifting one place gives . As an ordinary number, recordings fit.
The law that did the work is the quotient law — one division of the front numbers and one subtraction of the exponents. This item is also a reminder to finish the job: an answer of is numerically right but not in the required form, and rewriting it as is the same fact with the front number back between and .
Workbook-only items
Page 2, counting factors. In , is the base and is the exponent. , because one copy of is . In the figure the blue brace counts 3 factors, the red 2, and the black 5 in all. The product law: .
Page 5, where the minus sign lives. The parentheses decide what the base is. Read as "the opposite of ."
Page 7, matching factors off. Each pair struck through is a factor divided by itself, which equals . The quotient law: , for . The subtraction is always numerator exponent minus denominator exponent.
Page 12, the pattern down to zero. Step down one exponent, divide by . The last row is not a choice — it is what gives.
Page 14, the pattern below zero. A negative exponent is not a negative number. It is an instruction to take a reciprocal.
Page 19, counting groups. The outer exponent counts groups. The inner exponent counts factors inside a group. So the total multiplies. Power of a power: .
Page 20, boxed laws and warning frame. . , for , because sits in a denominator throughout the derivation. And , not — the coefficient takes the exponent too.
Page 24, monomials and the order of the work. A monomial is a number, a variable, or a product of numbers and variables. An answer is simplified when each base appears exactly once, every exponent is positive, the coefficient is a single number or a fraction in lowest terms, and no power of a power is left uncleared. The order of the work: (1) clear every outer exponent first; (2) multiply within the numerator and within the denominator; (3) divide the coefficients and reduce; (4) subtract exponents base by base; (5) move any negative exponent across the bar.
Page 27, powers of ten. One step right multiplies by ; one step left divides by . At the value is , labeled in the figure as one meter, one long stride.
Page 28, dividing in scientific notation. Divide the front numbers, then subtract the exponents. Check the two parts separately: a front-number ratio that comes out to exactly is a sign the setup is right, and one that comes out to or usually means a power of ten was misplaced.
Page 37, blank pattern tables. Both tables are for student work, so the expected entries are given here for the teacher.
Table A — powers of . The value column runs , , , , , , and the third column says the same thing on every row: , , , , . That constancy is the entire point — the rows at and below are not new rules but the next steps of a pattern already running, exactly as with powers of in Figures 3 and 4. Every value below is a positive number smaller than ; a negative entry there means the pattern was abandoned.
Table B — count the factors.
| Product | Factors written out | Count | One power |
|---|---|---|---|
| two pairs cancel, four s remain | |||
| groups of factors |
The four rows are deliberately one law each: two products, one quotient, one power of a power. A student who can fill the Count column from the Factors column has derived the laws rather than recalled them, which is what A.EO.3a asks for. Note that and not — equal exponents still add — and that and not , since repeating a group multiplies while joining rows adds.